NATO’s Secret Armies. Operation GLADIO and the Strategy of Tension

DG:  It is a reasonably hypothesis. During the Cold War, Gladio was tasked with fighting communism, but with the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 this requirement was relegated to the history books. (Nobody’s fighting communism today. China’s a communist country [in name], but it has adapted magnificently to capitalism. Nobody cares much about North Korea, and Cuba is in transition. So, communism is no longer an issue today.)

But what we do have today is Resource Wars: wars for oil and gas; and, obviously, the biggest resources – oil and gas – are in Muslim countries. If you look at Saudi Arabia – a Muslim country – it has huge oil resources.

If you look at Iraq, which was attacked in 2003 (under the false pretext of having weapons of mass destruction that didn’t exist), you have to ask: Why was that attack carried out? To my mind, it was because of its oil. 

So, maybe Sibel Edmonds is right. Maybe we now have false-flag Muslim terrorism, for the purposes of discrediting and justifying the bombing of Muslim countries. Maybe Western secret services support certain militant Muslims to carry out their attacks, because it helps to shock Europeans and Americans into a fear of Muslims.

If we consider together the Northwoods documents and the Gladio history, and project this modus operandi forward to our present day, we must ask: “Do we now live in an age in which Muslim terrorists are being supported by Western secret services? Are governments framing Muslims in order to justify NATO’s bombing of Muslim countries, as they once intended to frame the communists with Operation Northwoods?” (I can’t prove this, but I think it’s important for us to investigate.) To allow, cause, or support the premises behind such attacks, would be a State crime. Maybe that’s the situation we’re in; I don’t know.

DYI Comments:  The alliance [U.S. U.K. NATO EU] are engaging with aggressive military action to secure favorable oil contracts at the exclusion of other aggressor nations most notably China.  As I pointed out in an earlier post Sudan will be ramped up with additional American troops. The U.S. is posturing with increase military might to intimidate China from doing business with the Sudanese.

Don't be misled by the recent low oil prices thinking this is the new paradigm.  Oil prices could very easily go lower due to geopolitical events.  Saudi Arabia tired of the remaining OPEC nations cheating decided to increase production dramatically.  This lowered prices securing greater market share for the Saudi's.  At the same time lower prices has lowered the expectations for Iran's(Saudi's arch enemy) windfall as sanctions have been lifted.  This also has hurt Iran's benefactor Russia seen as the orthodox christian infidels from the Saudi's point of view.

If the Saudi's decide to go to the mat AND the world wide economy goes into a tailspin prices could very easily become a teenager(under $20).  IF that occurs, and plan as a Boy Scout - Be Prepared - lump summing into Adams Natural Resource Fund symbol PEO would be advocated.  Prices will not stay at that level advancing back to a possible trading range of $40 to $60 a barrel or higher.  The days of easy to find oil are over.  Resource wars began just after oil prices bottomed in 1998 inflation corrected price of $12.26 a barrel.  Oil and gas prices are in a secular bull market and any major downside correction is a buying opportunity.  

DYI