Up to
Date
Performance Derby
Massive
Over Valuation!
Formula Based Asset Allocation*** STOCKS *** BONDS *** GOLD *** CASH................................ GeoPolitics/Economics...Removing Theory from Conspiracies
What is the fair price of gold at this point in time? One way to find out is to compare gold to other asset classes. Be it stocks, real estate, bonds or other major asset classes. Such a comparison will help you understand whether gold is overvalued or undervalued at a given point in time.
In the following article, we will look at one metric, which is the ratio of the US Dow Jones stock index to the price of an ounce of gold.
While the “fair prices” of stocks and bonds can be calculated using cash flow models created by economists, the situation is a little more complicated for gold. Since gold does not generate cash flows (such as dividends or interest) and is primarily a reserve asset that retains its value over the long term, other indicators must be used to analyze the price level.
The prices of various assets measured in gold are very suitable, because in this case, fluctuations in the value of the currency are excluded from the formula. In today’s monetary system, the prices of essentially all assets increase in the long term, because money creation works in such a way that currency loses its value consistently and over the long term.
Therefore, it is worth comparing the assets themselves. For example, how many ounces of gold did the average home cost 50 years ago? How much gold does the average home cost today? These indicators provide a better overview of changes in the purchasing power of gold.
The Dow-to-gold ratio reached its absolute low in January 1980, reaching 0.99. Perhaps for the first time in history, an ounce of gold cost more than one Dow share. Over the next 20 years, stocks rose in price almost 50 times (!) in terms of gold. This ended in early 2000, when the technology bubble in the US stock markets burst and gold began a years-long rapid rise. Investors who exchanged their stocks for gold at the right moment (and vice versa in the previous cycle) were able to grow their assets by several dozen times.
The ratio reached 6 by 2011, but then started to rise again because the massive money printing by central banks did not bring the big price increase that many had expected. Rather, this money found its way into the stock markets and boosted the prices of stocks. Gold entered a bear phase.
Looking at recent history, the ratio peaked in 2019. At that time, one Dow Jones share cost 20.5 ounces of gold. Today, it has fallen to 10.0 – the historical median level. Over the past few years, the ratio has fallen sharply due to the rapid rise in gold prices.
Judging by the ratio, gold is currently at its mean relative to stocks. However, I expect the ratio to decline further. It is worth considering exchanging gold for stocks if the ratio drops below 5. However, it is wise to do this in parts, not all at once. It is not worth liquidating the entire gold position at this level.
While a drop to 5 would mean that gold is somewhat overvalued relative to stocks, the ratio is likely to fall significantly lower than that.
I believe we are currently in the early to mid-stages of a major bull cycle in precious metals, which could see the Dow Jones - to Gold Ratio in the 0.5-3 range in the future.
The current bull run for precious metals will be similar in scope to the 1970s, as the world continues to face stagflation (stagnant economic growth but high inflation). The world’s debt burden has risen above World War II levels, and deteriorating budgets mean that debt relief is likely to be achieved through currency dilution. This, in turn, means low productivity and high inflation – two key factors that characterize stagflation. This is an extremely favorable environment for the price of gold, as it is a traditional reserve asset that cannot be printed.
One could expect the ratio to fall significantly lower. Since the currency problems are actually even more serious than in the 1970s, the ratio could fall below 1. Given the current level of the Dow, this suggests a peak in the cycle for gold prices of $40,000-50,000 per ounce (the Dow is currently trading at 50,000).
Such a price target sounds absurd at the moment, but it must be taken into account that in such a case the price of gold would also be in a total bubble and extremely overvalued relative to stocks. Since the ratio reached 1-2 in both 1932 and 1980, it is not at all excluded that this time it will be the same. With such a low ratio, it probably makes sense to exchange the lion’s share of gold for other asset classes.
Bull
Market
For Declining
Interest Rates
Ended on
August 4, 2020
DYI: Over the coming years we'll experience increasing interest rates during growth and declining rates during recessions. This will be a saw tooth ever increasing rates with higher highs and higher lows as our government once again inflates away our massive debt to GDP just as they did after WWII with interest rate peaking at 15.84% (10 year T-bond) on 9-30-1981. DYI’s model portfolio reflects this with a large commitment to short term notes (2 to 3 year duration).
American’s
Shifting
to Pro-Labor?
The U.S. oscillates between pro-business and pro-labor within a multi-generational time line. Today IMO we are currently at the apex for the pro-business cycle grinding away at the top earners until incomes are once again flowing into the hands of the common man and women. This change will happen, however it will become nasty and very possibly violent as the masses demand a greater amount of the national income pie.
This economic and social event is of historical level as the so called elites attempt to quell (from their point of view) this growing surge of discontent. This was highlight by none other than the poster child of pro-business Larry Fink of Black Rock at Davos. Lena Petrova of World Affairs her video is mislabeled stating CAPITALISM Is COLLAPSING — BlackRock CEO Larry Fink Just Said The Quiet Part Out Loud. Capitalism is not collapsing it is simply a move by the masses for a more pro-labor stance.
Starting Early
Saving Consistently
Consistently Increasing Your Savings
Now put some numbers behind the chart below. Suppose someone saves an extra $7,500 a year starting in their early 30s and invests it steadily.
At a conservative 6 to 7 percent return, that alone compounds into roughly $600,000 to $700,000 over 30 years. On this table, that difference by itself is often enough to lift a household from around the median into the 75th percentile range by their late 50s or early 60s, assuming everything else is average. That shift does not require perfect timing or heroic returns. It just requires consistency and patience.
Time invested is so important that Jack can even stop adding to his investments and still have more than Jill at age 65.
If Jack were to contribute $200 per month from age 25 to 35 – contributing only $24,000 over 10 years – his investments would be worth almost $300,000 at age 65.
Jill continually invests $200 per month between ages 35 and 65 but still ends up with only $245,000 at 65. Even though she contributes three times as much as Jack over her lifetime ($72,000), because she missed those first 10 years of investing, Jack amasses more.
Jack's earnings will grow so large, they'll exceed all of his contributions combined. After 20 years of investing, Jack contributed $48,000 total. That same year, his $48,000 earned over $56,000. By year 25, his earnings ($103,000) are over 70% larger than his total contributions ($60,000).
This is why time is so important in investing: Given enough time, your earnings can compound to take on a life of their own. Even better is they can become self-sustainable. When your money is earning enough money that you no longer need to work, you've achieved financial independence.
You don't have to start investing $1,916 a month right away. It's OK to start small, as long as you start. You can always increase your contributions later.
Say you start with $200 a month. If you maintained those contributions for 40 years, you could accumulate about $500,000. But if you were able to increase your contributions by 5% each year, your portfolio could grow to more than $1 million in that same timeframe.
Just imagine how much you could accumulate starting with $200 per month and increasing your contributions by 10% each year? (Hint: It's more than $2.6 million in 40 years.)
lllllll
The Dow to Gold Ratio is calculated by dividing the Dow Jones Industrial Average by the price of one ounce of Gold.
The Dow-Gold ratio is a market indicator that helps investors decide where to put their money and when to do it.
Each peak and valley has been an example of over-exuberance in the markets, only to be squashed by reality.
In every bull market, some investors have mentioned "The Good Times are Never Going to End," but eventually, they do.
DYI Comment: An almost vertical price increase for gold and especially silver that increases significantly a shakeout correction for the metals. As this massive overvaluation for U.S. stocks eventually plays out to the downside in the meantime we’ll experience a see saw ride upward for precious metals. Again expect a shakeout correction for the metals.
--As the stock market becomes more expensive, a conservative investor's stock allocation should go down. The rationale recognizes the reduced expected future returns for stocks, and the increasing risk.
--The formula acknowledges the increased likelihood of the market falling from current levels based on historical valuation levels and regression to the mean, rather than from volatility. Many agree this is the key to value investing.
Points of ‘secular’ undervaluation such as 1922, 1932, 1949, 1974 and 1982 typically occurred about 50% below historical mean valuations, and were associated with subsequent 10-year nominal total returns approaching 20% annually.
By contrast, valuations similar to 1929, 1965 and 2000 were followed by weak or negative total returns over the following decade.
That’s the range where we find ourselves today.
John P. Hussman
Is the
U.S. Stock Market
Overvalued?
Yes; Significantly!
To Arrive
at the Mean
Stocks
need to Decline
60%!
When will the the bear show it self??
I don't know?
When the bear does show it self IMO we'll be in a multi-cycle bear market simliar to the 1970's with nominal declines and rebounds as the purchasing power is ravaged by non stop inflation. So don't go losing your head when everyone else is losing theirs!