Monday, March 31, 2014

Margin of Safety!


Central Concept of Investment for the purchase of Common Stocks.
"The danger to investors lies in concentrating their purchases in the upper levels of the market..."

Stocks compared to bonds:
Earnings Yield Coverage Ratio - [EYC Ratio]

EYC Ratio = [ (1/PE10) x 100] / Bond Rate
2.0 plus: Safe for large lump sums & DCA
1.5 plus: Safe for DCA

1.49 or less: Mid-Point - Hold stocks and purchase bonds.

1.00 or less: Sell stocks - rebalance portfolio - Re-think stock/bond allocation.

Current EYC Ratio: 0.87
As of 04-1-14

PE10 as report by Multpl.com
Bond Rate is the Moody's Seasoned Aaa Corporate bond rate as reported by the St. Louis Federal Reserve.
DCA is Dollar Cost Averaging.

DYI Comments:  Despite the Fed's engineered sub atomic low interest rates the U.S. stock market is poised to under perform the bond market over the next 7 to 10 years.  It is time to re-think your stock/bond allocation before the market re-prices to a lower level.

DYI

How You, I, and Everyone Got the Top 1 Percent All Wrong

It turns out that wealth inequality isn't about the 1 percent v. the 99 percent at all. It's about the 0.1 percent v. the 99.9 percent (or, really, the 0.01 percent vs. the 99.99 percent, if you like). Long-story-short is that this group, comprised mostly of bankers and CEOs, is riding the stock market to pick up extraordinary investment income. And it's this investment income, rather than ordinary earned income, that's creating this extraordinary wealth gap. 
The 0.1 percent isn't the same group of people every year. There's considerable churn at the tippy-top. For example, consider the "Fortunate 400," the IRS's annual list of the 400 richest tax returns in the country. Between 1992 and 2008, 3,672 different taxpayers appeared on the Fortunate 400 list. Just one percent of the Fortunate 400—four households—appeared on the list all 17 years.
DYI Comments:  It appears that human nature has not changed when it comes to income or net worth as individuals will move up and down the economic scale. Also as these Billionaires and Millionaires age many will give large sums of money to charities thereby moving down the economic ladder.  Of course politicians desire high estate taxes so they can give away the money through government programs to enhance their reelection chances (vote buying).

DYI  

Sunday, March 30, 2014


Feeble returns on the safest investments such as bank deposits and fixed-income securities represent a “financial repression” transferring money from savers to borrowers, says Bill Gross, manager of the world’s biggest bond fund. Workers 65 and older, struggling with years of depressed yields, are the only group of Americans who are increasingly employed or looking for jobs, according to Labor Department participation-rate data. 

“We’re going to be financially repressed for decades,” Gross, the 69-year-old billionaire co-founder of Pacific Investment Management Co., told Bloomberg Radio Feb. 7, citing Federal Reserve interest-rate policy that aims to cut borrowing costs. “I hate to be gloomy, but, yes, for the next 10 years, the oldsters, and I’m in that camp, are going to be disappointed in terms of the policy rate.” 

“The magic of compound interest works very slowly when real rates are very low,” said Poterba, also a professor of economics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge. “Interest rates that have prevailed for the last few years have made it more challenging for savers to accumulate wealth, particularly if they are trying to do so in a relatively risk-free way.”
U.S. Treasury yields are at least 2 percentage points under what they would be otherwise because of the Fed’s low-rate policies and stimulus programs, said William Ford, former Atlanta Fed president who wrote a 2011 paper estimating the impact on savers of monetary easing. That reduces their income by at least $280 billion annually, his analysis shows. 
“The costs of low interest rates are being ignored,” Ford said in an interview. “It is killing savers, elderly savers who are living on life savings that have been conservatively invested.”
 Loomis Sayles & Co. Vice Chairman Dan Fuss, 80, can see the impact of low rates on retirees at the grocery store near his home in Wellesley, Massachusetts. 
“If you look at the average age of the people bagging the groceries, I want to help them push the cart out; and look at those riding the commuter train at rush hour, a lot of them are my age,” said Fuss, who managed the two best large U.S. bond funds during the past 10 years. 
He says he’s still working because he loves it, yet empathizes with those who have no choice. “The savers are screaming.”
DYI Comments:  It is very possible that financial repression could be with us well into the 2020's as Boomer's begin receiving Social Security and Medicare. Those two programs are under funded which will require large borrowings at low rates.  Look to the Federal Reserve to step on gas (money printing) when it is needed to push down rates.  With all of this cheap money flowing around the stock markets volatility up and down will most likely be very exaggerated.

So Buckle up we're in for a bumpy ride!

DYI 


Interesting chart you may find helpful.

Want to retire with $1 million? Here's how much you need to be saving right now

How much you need to save also depends on  the return rate. This chart shows how much you need to put into your savings account each month for a variety of annual return rates:
 


DYI

Friday, March 28, 2014

Pentagon: Russian Forces on Ukraine's Border Not Conducting Routine Exercises

The Pentagon says there is no indication that Russian troops massed near the border with Ukraine are conducting routine military exercises, and that the buildup is doing nothing to de-escalate tensions in the region. 

Several media outlets reported Wednesday that Western intelligence agencies believe Russia now has more than 30,000 troops on its border with eastern Ukraine, and quoted unnamed officials as saying further Russian military incursions into Ukraine are possible. 

On Sunday, NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Europe, U.S. Air Force General Philip Breedlove, said Russia had built up a large force on Ukraine's eastern border that could move westward into Moldova's mainly Russian-speaking separatist Transdniestria region.
DYI Comments:  Many have speculated that Russia would invade the Ukraine once the Winter Olympics concluded.  It is now almost a forgone conclusion as we wait for the tanks to roll.  The Russian commander's are only waiting for the campaign season to begin with the warming spring weather.  The Ukraine's independence is gone; unless they submit politically tanks will roll and blood will be shed.

The Baltic states especially Estonia (and the Laplands of Finland) are now in a permanent state of insomnia.

Are they next?

DYI  

The Zeal for Yield is Full On for State Pensions...The Bust will End in a Trail of Tears of Pension Haircuts and Taxpayer Bailouts.

Pension funds more risky with your money: Pro

CapRidge Partners' founder Steve LeBlanc said pension funds have been moving away from a 60-40 allocation between stocks and bonds. As underfunded pensions chase better returns to meet their obligations, managers have moved money from stocks to private equity and from fixed income into real estate, he said. 
Pension funds are also moving into high yield bonds and emerging market debt, LeBlanc told CNBC. If they don't add more risk, they'll never be able to meet the 8 percent returns needed for actuarial costs, LeBlanc said. 
"We're not going to be able to honor all the commitments we have made with all the teachers and firemen and policemen unless we get higher rates of return," Rubenstein said. "If we were to tax people more we wouldn't have to do this. But we don't want to tax people to pay for these benefits."
DYI Comments:  Classic promises made by the industry shills.  Very easy to promise a 8% return when it's OPM (other people's money).  Currently we are in a long term low return environment attempting to achieve returns significantly higher will end in a trail of tears.

Pension plans by their very nature are conservatively financed under takings and should not be used for speculations.  What has happened the beneficiaries (workers) have been over promised pension benefits for years and in some cases decades.  The politicians have abandoned any shred of fiduciary responsibility by swinging for the fences to avoid pension haircuts or tax increases, kicking the can down the road long enough for him or her to be out of office.  Organization such as the one above is tapping into this panic to generate business.

Here is what they are up against.

Video: Shiller's PE10 portends low returns

 

Grantham Predicts A Bust ‘Unlike Any Other’

Grantham’s prediction is that assets, which he sees as generally expensive right now, will fall in value over the next seven years until they are cheap once again. Since we’ve never been in this situation before, Grantham is relying partially on anecdotal evidence to frame his argument (as he acknowledges), but for someone who correctly called the last two stock market drops, to predict a third should at least get people’s attention.

The coming bust in US stocks

There are several other signs of froth which could warn of an impending collapse. Data from the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) shows margin debt (adjusted for inflation) to be at an all-time high—matching the S&P500’s trend of breaking multiple previous highs. Initial public offerings (IPOs) have been the greatest beneficiaries of this flush of liquidity, particularly companies with negative earnings which make up 74% of all IPOs. All the while corporate insiders have been net sellers of equities—being the most bearish in the last quarter of a century.
 

Estimated 10yr return on Stocks

Using 5.4% as the historical growth rate of dividends and 4.0% as the ending yield.

Starting Yield*---------return**
1.0%-----------------------(-5.7%)
1.5%-----------------------(-1.7%)
 
2.0%----------1.3% You are Here!
2.5%------------------------3.8%

3.0%------------------------5.9%
3.5%------------------------7.8%
4.0%------------------------9.4%
4.5%-----------------------10.9%

5.0%-----------------------12.3%
5.5%-----------------------13.6%
6.0%-----------------------14.8%
6.5%-----------------------15.9%

7.0%-----------------------17.0%
7.5%-----------------------18.0%
8.0%-----------------------19.0%

*Starting dividend yield of the S&P500-**10yr estimated average annual rate of return.

DYI 

Thursday, March 27, 2014

Few understand that Social Security is already means-tested

First, let’s look at how benefits are calculated. What most people don’t know is that our employment tax dollars don’t all buy the same amount of future benefit. Some of our employment tax dollars buy six times as much in benefits as others.
According to the most recent Trustees Report, for instance, the first $767 of “average indexed monthly earnings” (a complex formula that adjusts earnings over time) is credited at a 90 percent rate, assuring the lowest wage workers of a retirement benefit nearly equal to their earned wage. 
Wages of more than $767 a month but less than $4,624 a month are credited at a 32 percent rate. This means retirement benefits increase at a much lower rate. The benefit pinching, however, does not end there.
 For wages of more than $4,624 a month up to the wage base maximum ($113,700 for 2013), the crediting rate is only 15 percent. Thus, all the wages earned — and employment taxes paid — over that $55,488-a-year “bend point” gain benefits at only one-sixth the rate of the lowest wage earners. 
In effect, the Social Security benefits formula functions as a sharply graduated benefits “tax,” reducing the benefits that accrue to higher wages by 85 percent. The higher your means, the lower your benefit.
 In its first year, it was expected to affect only 3 percent of all retirees. The formula for the taxation of Social Security benefits, however, is one of the few items in our miserable tax code that is not indexed to inflation. 
As a consequence, an estimated 30 percent of all retirees now pay some amount of tax on their benefits.
All of this is history. It all happened before our slippery friends in Washington started dealing with “entitlement reform.” Soon they will start talking about changing the formula for future benefits and other sneaky ways to reduce — or further “means-test” — benefits.
DYI Comments:  Now that America's birth rate is below replacement (currently 2.06) future young taxpayers needed to fund retiree's will be less available.

Additional means testing will be coming soon within the next two presidential cycles irregardless of the party in charge (or divided Congress).

DYI

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

China's output contracts at quickest pace in 18 months during March

 Flash China Manufacturing PMI™ at 48.1 in 
March (48.5 in February). Eight-month low. 
 Flash China Manufacturing Output Index at 47.3 
in March (48.8 in February). Eighteen-month 
low. 
Data collected 12–20 March 2014.

DYI Comments:  China's slowdown continues.  Will this slowdown be enough to throw China into an outright contraction is the big question.  If it does, look for the Chinese to ramp up their government spending to cover the difference.  However the day of reckoning can only be postponed before all of the debt buildup in the private sector collapses with China going into a 1930's style depression.  Many of us have been predicting this collapse for the past five years.  Market and governments can stay far longer irrational than most of us thought possible.  However, the SSE Composite (Shanghai) is down from its height of 5900 in October of 2007 to today at 2063.  That is a decline of 65% with the majority of that decline bottoming in October of 2008 at 1728.  Are Chinese shares undervalued?  It appears that at least they are far cheaper than before the huge speculative mania of 2006-2007 and have been flat in price since 2012.  For those who are looking to diversify their stock holdings look into the Matthew Asian Funds [Matthews China Fund]. With the potential debt bomb exploding dollar cost averaging would only be recommended.
   
DYI

Disclaimer

This blog site is not a registered financial advisor, broker or securities dealer and The Dividend Yield Investor is not responsible for what you do with your money.
This site strives for the highest standards of accuracy; however ERRORS AND OMISSIONS ARE ACCEPTED!
The Dividend Yield Investor is a blog site for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY.
The Dividend Yield Investor shall not be held liable for any loss and/or damages from the information herein.
Use this site at your own risk.

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NO GUARANTEE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

Budget 2014: Pensioners should be 'trusted' not to squander their savings, George Osborne says


Pensioners are “responsible” and should be “trusted” to make the right financial decisions, George Osborne has said, amid warnings that his reforms could lead to elderly people squandering their savings. 
The Chancellor defended moves to allow people to cash in their retirement funds, saying it will help pensioners who have been getting a bad deal from annuities. 
Labour has questioned whether people could end up struggling financially if they spend all their money soon after retiring.
The centrepiece of the Chancellor’s fifth Budget was the scrapping of rules that force most Britons to use their pension savings to buy an annuity.
 Pension campaigners have welcomed Mr Osborne’s “savings revolution”, saying that it would finally stop people being forced to buy poor-value annuities that condemned them to receiving low annual incomes.
DYI Comments:  When it comes to the generalized public allowing retiree's to have a lump sum is total insanity.  Most will squander the money leaving them without a shilling to their name when they need it the most, especially in advance age.  The British government would be far better off reforming the insurance industry's annuity business or allowing systematic withdraw no higher than 6% per year.

Here in the good old U.S. of A. pension plans such as 401k's, IRA's (Roth) the money is too difficult to put in and far too easy to take out.  At least the U.K. by 2018 will have universal auto enrollment. Auto enrollment in the USA is just starting but has a default 3% of earnings into 401k's. That is a far cry from the necessary and minimum of 15% of income to fund a retirement. Human nature being what it is most will never increase the amount and end up being way behind when they finally realize the need to get serious about retirement.

Taking the money out (DYI's opinion):  For America's pension plans three generalized rules; (1.) Age 60 no lump sums (transfers are OK) purchase an annuity or systematic withdraw no higher than 6% (2.)  Early withdraw (before age 60) disability confirmed by two doctors.  (3.) Death.  This will stop the leakage.

DYI      

Will The Last Bear Please Turn Out The Lights?

DYI Comments:  Despite the massive overvaluation only the most wealthy have benefited from this market rise.  This of course could end up being far more temporary than permanent due to excessively high PE multiple 25.60 and sub atomic low dividend yield of 1.88%.  This group if they don't move to a more conservative investment posture AND accept a lower percentage withdraw their capital will easily decline.  Moving this group from being confident to a retiree's greatest financial fear; outliving their money.  Moving back into the workforce in your late 70's is extremely slim, in your 80's is absurd.   

Retirement confidence bounces back, but only among wealthy savers

(Reuters) - Americans who owned stocks in 2013 are feeling better about their retirement prospects than they did just a few years ago. For everyone else, not so much.
Most disturbing, the survey found no progress among a large segment of workers in accumulating retirement savings. Thirty-six percent of all workers say they have less than $1,000 saved for retirement, and 68 percent of workers earning $35,000 or less have saved less than $1,000.
DYI Continues:  The most taunting task is convincing a young person to take serious of your retirement needs.  Retirement 30 or 40 years in the future is an eternity away from reality.  Of course starting early it is so much easier and far less expensive.

For both young and old DYI has advocated a conservative investment mix of 40% stocks and 60% bonds for all pension accounts.  My opinion is that 401k's or Roth or standard IRA's are pension vehicles and by their very nature (the money must be there) conservatively managed.  They should never be used for aggressive investing and certainly not designed to "play the market" as a speculator. [DYI's aggressive portfolio is for moneys outside of a pension attempting to produce higher returns].

Unfortunately due to our "jacked up" stock and bond markets current returns will be sub par for our pension plans.  Our advice for the young person (or middle aged) is to continue with their standard percentage (DYI recommends 15%) into their 401k or IRA.  Any additional moneys that can be saved should be used to build out our model portfolio.  In other words due to high valuations it is not time to attempt to pre-fund one's retirement with large amounts of savings.  Our retiree's will need to accept a current withdraw at 2% or less (if possible) or they will have an unacceptable decline in net worth with the real possibility of out living their money.

How sub par will the returns be?  Let's check in with John Hussman of the Hussman Funds.


 A “Hideous Opportunity Set”
Based on valuation methods that have maintained a near-90% correlation with actual subsequent market returns not only historically but also in recent decades, we presently estimate 10-year nominal total returns for the S&P 500 Index averaging just 2.3% annually. It is worth remembering that these same methods indicated the likelihood of 10-year S&P 500 total returns averaging 10-12% annually in late-2008 and early-2009 (our 2009 insistence on stress-testing against Depression-era data was not based on valuation concerns). Moreover, our current estimates of prospective S&P 500 total returns are negative on every horizon shorter than about 7 years. Meanwhile, corporate bond yields and spreads are near record lows, Treasury bill yields are near zero, and the 10-year Treasury bond yield is just over 2.7%. Our friend James Montier at GMO correctly calls this a “hideous opportunity set.” 
To give an indication of how hideous the opportunity set of both short- and long-horizon investors has become as a result of quantitative easing and Fed-induced speculation, the chart below shows the estimated return of a balanced portfolio that assumes an allocation of 20% in Treasury bills, 20% in corporate bonds, 20% in Treasury bonds, and 40% in the S&P 500. We currently estimate that the prospective 10-year return on such a balanced portfolio is now at the lowest level in history, at just over 2% annually. The process of driving security prices higher and prospective long-term returns lower has been greatly satisfying over the short-run. The future will be a mirror image, as it was following other historic speculative episodes.
DYI Continues:  Why are future returns so dismal? Here are a few reasons....

By Michael Lombardi
March 13, 2014



OR

Wall Street’s Calling The Sheep To Slaughter: Smart Money Getting Out of Dodge

We also know that some pretty smart portfolio managers – mostly value oriented – are also sitting on a lot of cash. FPA Crescent fund, run by Steve Romick, is sitting on 44% cash in the fund. That is significant, in my opinion, because FPA managed to outperform the market by a rather wide margin in 2008 when it was down just 20%. Sequoia Fund, another fund that outperformed in 2008 and like FPA has a very long track record, has 18% cash. Yacktman Focused Fund, down 23% in 2008, has 20% of their portfolio in cash. 
And last but not least, let’s not forget the author of the quote that leads this article, none other than Warren Buffet in a shareholder letter from 1988. While Berkshire has been adding to its stock holdings, cash is building up faster than Buffet and his acolytes can deploy it. Cash rose in the latest quarter to almost $50 billion against a stock portfolio of a bit over $100 billion. Now that sounds like a big allocation to cash but it really isn’t apples to apples compared to a mutual fund because Berkshire has a lot of operating businesses. Buffet has said he likes to keep $20 billion in cash around just in case his reinsurance business gets hit hard one year. But it should make you pause a bit that Buffet can’t find enough bargains to keep his cash down to his preferred level.
Do You Feel the Same as DYI?

The VIX volatility index has been bouncing around near the bottom of its historic range. Stock market leverage, as measured by margin debt, has been setting records month after month, while the volume on the New York Stock Exchange has been declining since the last crash and now languishes at lows not seen this millennium. And the percentage of stock market bears in the Investor Intelligence Sentiment survey is hovering at around 15%, the lowest since early 1987, a few months before the epic crash when "portfolio insurance," invented, engineered, and provided by the geniuses on Wall Street, had once and for all eliminated the risks in the stock market. 
In February, Goldman’s Chief US Equity Strategist David Kostin wrote in his report “When does the party end?" that the enterprise-to-sales ratio was “now the highest in 35 years (and probably far longer), surpassing even the dotcom bubble.”
DYI 

Monday, March 24, 2014

30-Year Market Forecast For Investment Planning, 2014 Edition

Thirty-Year Estimates of Bonds, Stocks and REITs Assuming a 2.0% Inflation Rate
Asset ClassesReal ReturnWith 2.0% InflationRisk* Estimate
Government-Backed Fixed Income
U.S. Treasury bills (1-month maturity)0.12.12.0
10-year U.S. Treasury notes1.93.97.0
20-year U.S. Treasury bonds2.54.58.0
30-year inflation protected Treasury (TIPS)2.94.99.0
GNMA mortgages2.44.48.0
10-year tax-free municipal (A rated)2.04.07.0
Corporate and Emerging Market Fixed Income
10-year investment-grade corporate (AAA-BBB)2.64.69.0
20-year investment-grade corporate (AAA-BBB)3.35.310.0
10-year high-yield corporate (BB-B)4.56.515.0
Foreign government bonds (unhedged)2.64.69.0
U.S. Common Equity and REITs
U.S. large-cap stocks5.07.019.0
U.S. small-cap stocks5.37.322.0
U.S. small-value stocks6.08.026.0
REITs (real estate investment trusts)5.07.019.0
International Equity (unhedged)
Developed countries5.47.419.0
Developed countries small company5.77.722.0
Developed countries small value companies6.48.426.0
All emerging markets including frontier countries7.09.029.0
Source:  Rick Ferri

DYI Comments:  An important point to remember this is for money placed today or stock & bonds held  for the next 30 years to achieve the anticipated return.  Note that the returns for stocks are about 3/4 of the long term return (must be held 30yrs).

 100% stocks100% stocks
Historical Risk/Return (1926–2013)
Average annual return10.2%
Best year (1933)54.2%
Worst year (1931)–43.1%
Years with a loss25 of 88
Source: Vanguard

Anticipated bond returns are slated to achieve returns closer to their long term averages.
100% bonds
Historical Risk/Return (1926–2013)
Average annual return5.5%
Best year (1982)32.6%
Worst year (1969)–8.1%
Years with a loss
14 of 88
Source: Vanguard
Before placing dollars at risk it is DYI's opinion you should be paid at least the long term average.  For stocks today high valuation equals poor returns going forward (10yr estimation under 2%).  The Great Wait continues.

DYI 

 

Saturday, March 22, 2014

Europe’s hot new export is deflation

Opinion: Falling prices will make global debt crisis explode again


LONDON (MarketWatch) — For all its economic troubles, the euro zone remains a great exporting powerhouse, making a vast range of products that sell well around the world. Germany has its top-of-the-range cars, France its wines and aircraft, and Italy its food and fashion. But now Europe is exporting something that is going to be very damaging to the global economy — deflation. 
Prices have already started to tumble across a range of European countries.
 Stuff getting cheaper — most consumers will think that is just fine. In a healthy economy, it often is. In the euro zone, however, it is not. There are two reasons.
One is that all the peripheral countries within the euro EURUSD +0.1004%  have crippling levels of debt. Deflation makes that much, much worse — the debt stays the same, but the income to service it keeps falling. The second is that all of them also have to claw back competitiveness with Germany by cutting wages. That is painful enough in normal circumstances. With deflation, you have to cut wages even more to ever have a chance of getting back into the game. Falling prices take a bad situation — and make it a lot worse.
DYI Comments:  Until Boomers have exited from the work force in numbers (2020's) but continue to consume creating the seeds of a labor shortage low inflation/deflation will occur.  Continue to expect sub par GDP growth under 2.0%,  low interest rates with some form of stimulus packages coming out of Washington.

It appears that MarketWatch is advocating that the European Central Bank print like mad men in order to create a rise in inflation.  This is only good for the bankers who will receive the bulk of the new money first which at that time will not be inflationary.  As the Euro's move through the economy the general populous will end up with inflated Euro's; they will be stuck with the bill for the bankers reckless behavior.  It is nothing more than a banker bail out.  I'm surprised that MarketWatch is being a shill for European bankers for what is needed is debt restructure by taking haircuts and stretching out of payments.  Printing one's currency until inflation occurs is not only bad economics (reducing middle class net worth) but a form of legalized fraud.

**********************************
DYI Comments:  Below are two articles regarding gold which has sold off significantly.  For those of you who need to rebalance by taking profits from this high flying stock market the mining stocks are good value as they have taken a pounding greater than the physical metal. Gold as measured by the Dow/Gold ratio is pricey at at 12.22 to 1.  However, gold's secular bull market has not completed it's journey to massive overvaluation.

AGGRESSIVE PORTFOLIO - ACTIVE ALLOCATION - 03/1/14

Active Allocation Bands 10% to 60%
45% - Cash -Short Term Bond Index - VGPMX
25% -Gold- Precious Metals & Mining - VBIRX
20% -Lt. Bonds- Long Term Bond Index - VBLTX
10% -Stocks- Equity Income Fund - VEIPX
[See Disclaimer]

Follow China’s Lead into Gold




DYI

    

Monday, March 17, 2014

The Greatest Retirement Crisis In American History

We are on the precipice of the greatest retirement crisis in the history of the world. In the decades to come, we will witness millions of elderly Americans, the Baby Boomers and others, slipping into poverty. Too frail to work, too poor to retire will become the “new normal” for many elderly Americans. 
That dire prediction, which I wrote two years ago, is already coming true. Our national demographics, coupled with indisputable glaringly insufficient retirement savings and human physiology, suggest that a catastrophic outcome for at least a significant percentage of our elderly population is inevitable. With the average 401(k) balance for 65 year olds estimated at $25,000 by independent experts – $100,000 if you believe the retirement planning industry - the decades many elders will spend in forced or elected “retirement” will be grim. 

Retirement Account Balances by Income: Even the Highest Earners Don't Have Enough

SCEPA income chart

How much should people really be saving?
More. Far more. Many people are still assuming that they'll get 10 percent annual returns on their savings; the stock market volatility of recent years would suggest that's overly optimistic. To provide for a retirement lasting 20 years, Vanguard, a major 401(k) administrator, now recommends an annual contribution of 12 to 15 percent of income, including an employer's match. But even that is only enough if you start young: A worker who starts contributing at 35 and earns $43,000 has to sock away more than $10,000 a year, the Center for Retirement Research estimates, to maintain his or her lifestyle after retiring at 65. The Employee Benefit Research Institute says the average earner will need $900,000 upon retirement — a sum few people are on target to reach. 
 Skimming off the top
Future retirees don't have only themselves to blame for paltry retirement savings. Excessive management fees also play a role. Every day, Americans pay about $164 million in 401(k) fees to the financial industry. "There are enormous dollar amounts involved," said Frank Cirullo, a former plan consultant. "Employees are getting ripped off." Fees vary from plan to plan, and can run anywhere from 0.5 to 2 percent of assets per year. An extra 0.5 percent annual fee can cut an employee's savings by 10 percent by the time he's 65, according to Vanguard. Most 401(k) fees have long been hidden, but under new rules taking effect this summer, plan providers have to give detailed breakdowns of all the fees to employers, who in turn have to inform employees. Savers can only hope that transparency kicks off competition that will lower fees.

How to Calculate Your Retirement Number

Save 18 percent. That's the savings rate a medium-earner ($43,084 in 2010) would need if he or she starts saving at age 35 and plans to retire at age 68 (assuming a 4 percent return on investments), according to the Boston College's Center for Retirement Research. The Center issued a brief that provides savings rates need based on a variety of factors, including retirement age, rate of return, income, and age that contributions begin. (The savings rates would allow retirees to replace 80 percent of their working salaries and calculations factor in Social Security income.) The Employee Benefit Research Institute reports that on average, employees contribute just 7.5 percent of their income into their retirement accounts. 
The analysis found that the two most important factors for creating a retirement nest egg are one's savings rate and the age of retirement. "If people could work until they're 70, they would have a much higher chance of having a secure retirement. Social Security is higher if you wait until age 70, and it gives your 401(k) assets a longer chance to grow, and it reduces the number of years you have to support yourself," says Alicia Munnell, the center's director. Less important was the rate of return earned on investments.

How Much Retirement Savings Do You Need?

Simple Targets for a Retirement Nest Egg 
So how much money do you need to retire comfortably? People want a neat and tidy number or formula; unfortunately, not much in life is neat and tidy, particularly when it comes to retirement planning.
If you're thinking about retiring soon, at the very least, you should get into the ballpark with respect to how much retirement savings you'll need. The simplest way is to use some rough rules of thumb. Suppose you need a given amount of annual retirement income to supplement Social Security, pensions, and wages (if you work in your retirement years). To estimate the retirement savings needed to generate this income, multiply your required annual income by:
  • 20 if you're retiring in your mid to late 60s or later
  • 25 if you're retiring in your late 50s or early 60s
  • 33 if you want to be virtually certain you don't outlive your assets and you want to leave money to children or charities when you're gone
For instance, suppose you need to generate a pre-tax annual retirement income of $20,000, in addition to your other retirement income. You'll need retirement savings of:
  • $400,000 using the 20 multiplier
  • $500,000 using the 25 multiplier
  • $660,000 using the 33 multiplier
DYI Comments:  No doubt planning for retirement is an arduous task along with implementing your plan.  I have found that using so called professionals will run from top notch to an almost know nothing.  So it is best to become as educated as possible.  Sounds so simple yet so few will take the time or the effort.  Let's take a look at the last example of 20 times income ($20,000) or $400,000 nest egg for retirement.

Using TimeValue.com  calculator plugging in an after inflation conservative return of 4% what dollar amount per month is needed to amass $400,000.  Assuming he or she gets serious about retirement age 35 and then retires after 30 years.

$576. dollars per month seems very doable.  At $25,000 income that is 28% of their income!  Better hope for lots of pay raises.

At $50,000 income it will be 14% of their income.  A big piece of one's income but very doable.

You can play around with the numbers however I would not advise going higher than an after inflation return (and fees) of 6%.  You could very easily come up short.

Want to know if you are on track use a present value calculator?  Staying with the same example of a required nest egg of $400,000.  Suppose our 40 year now has $100,000 in retirement savings.  He needs $300,000 more to make his goal.  With 25 years to go and sticking with our after fee/inflation return of 4% his pension is underfunded by $12,535.  He will need to boost up his percentage amount of savings.  This can be calculated by going back to the monthly savings goal and adjusting his required savings.

For most folks retirement will be not be a depicted on TV as a life of leisure, travel, fine dining etc; it will be nervous at best financially and for many very scary.  The biggest fear an elderly person has is running out of money.

Our Ridiculous Approach to Retirement

Not yet convinced that failure is baked into the voluntary, self-directed, commercially run retirement plans system? Consider what would have to happen for it to work for you. First, figure out when you and your spouse will be laid off or be too sick to work. Second, figure out when you will die. Third, understand that you need to save 7 percent of every dollar you earn. (Didn’t start doing that when you were 25 and you are 55 now? Just save 30 percent of every dollar.) Fourth, earn at least 3 percent above inflation on your investments, every year. (Easy. Just find the best funds for the lowest price and have them optimally allocated.) Fifth, do not withdraw any funds when you lose your job, have a health problem, get divorced, buy a house or send a kid to college. Sixth, time your retirement account withdrawals so the last cent is spent the day you die.
DYI Continues:  Not a very happy note to end on but if you are reading this blog then you are light years ahead of the average person.

DYI