Big Pharma!

Observations 

It is possible, and even probable that some of the current ‘truth movements’ have been set up by the ‘would-be controllers’ for the sole purpose of initiating their ‘divide and conquer’ strategy to destroy the real ‘truth’ about important topics of our times, such as the existence of ‘viruses’. 

As many of us have now demonstrated, there is no evidence that any particle that has been labelled a ‘virus’ has been proven to be the cause of disease. This can be stated as a fact about reality and therefore shown to be ‘true’ - unless and until someone can provide some genuine evidence that demonstrates otherwise. This fact about viruses can be extrapolated to also apply to bacteria and other so-called ‘germs’, which have also never been proven to be ‘disease-causing’ agents.

Taken together, these facts threaten not only the entire vaccine industry, but also a huge proportion of the pharmaceutical industry, as well as a significant proportion of the chemical industry, because there is no longer any need for them to manufacture products that ‘fight germs’.

Obviously, those of us who maintain that there is no evidence for the existence of pathogenic ‘germs’, whether viruses, bacteria, fungi or parasites, are still a relatively small group, although we cannot be referred to as a ‘movement’ as we do not have leaders.

There is a second group of people who correctly claim that vaccines are dangerous, but incorrectly claim that there are nevertheless such things as ‘pathogenic germs’, especially viruses. This somewhat larger group is comprised of and led by many highly qualified doctors and scientists, a factor that serves to make their case seem highly credible to the general public.

Then there is a third group, which comprises mainstream organizations such as the WHO, CDC, NHS and government ‘health’ departments in almost every country. This group states that ‘Covid’ is/was real, masks and social distancing are important measures to protect public health, and that vaccines are safe and effective. This group also continues to promulgate ‘stories’ about various other ‘infectious diseases’ and threats of ‘future pandemics’.

The existence of these 3 groups with seemingly irreconcilable differences serves the ‘agenda’ by ensuring that the general public, or most of them at least, remain confused, which makes them more likely to defer to the mainstream and their narrative because they are more familiar with them as the ‘experts’ with respect to matters of health, although familiarity is not the same as truth. This situation has the potential to destroy any and all opposition in the process.