COVID

Hypocrisy!

Pfizer CEO Has NOT HAD HIS SHOT!

Click HERE for link to 153news.net video

DYI 

 COVID

Madness

The FDA has identified this as a Class I recall, the most serious type of recall. Use of these devices may cause serious injuries or death.

Innova Medical Group Recalls Unauthorized SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test with Risk of False Test Results

Reason for Recall

Innova Medical Group is recalling its SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test. Labeling distributed with certain configurations of the test includes performance claims that did not accurately reflect the performance estimates observed during the clinical studies of the tests. The performance characteristics of the test have not been adequately established, presenting a risk of false results.

• False-negative results may lead to delayed diagnosis or inappropriate treatment of SARS-CoV-2, which may cause patient harm including serious illness and death. False-negative results can also lead to further spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, including when presumed negative patients are grouped into cohorts in health care, long-term care, and other facilities based on false test results.
• False-positive results could lead to a delay in the correct diagnosis and the initiation of an appropriate treatment for the actual cause of patient illness, which could be another life-threatening disease that is not SARS-CoV-2. False-positive results could also lead to further spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus when presumed positive patients are grouped into cohorts based on false test results.

Who May Be Affected

• People who were tested using these devices
• Health care providers who may have access to and use these tests or whose patients have used these tests
• Organizers of large testing programs, such as on college campuses, who may be using and distributing these tests for diagnostic use

DYI:  One down and so many more needed to bring a halt to this COVID madness.  Looks to me now that the easy money through testing has now ended these companies will be exiting the false positive game – [along with the revenues earned] – as they disappear into the sunset.  The vast amount of money stolen through this FAKE pandemic is breathtaking.  And now have staggering levels of harms and death from their so called vaccines.  This will only stop when the super majority of Americans simply refuse to comply with any of their insane measures.

Click HERE for the link to the FDA.

DYI     

 COVID-19

Deadly Madness

THE HOUSE OF CARDS BEGINS TO FALL! DR. SHERRI TENPENNY TESTIFIES, 'ORDINARY CITIZENS WERE SHOCKED'!

DYI:  A riveting testimony regarding this experimental gene therapy inoculation masquerading as a vaccine.  If she is correct, with the body of evidence is pointing in her direction that vast amounts of our citizens during the fall and winter – [cold and flu] - season will become very ill with many deaths. 

Click HERE to connect you to this riveting video. 

DYI

Dr. Popper knocks it out of the park! Make no mistake the FDA will approve these so called vaccines!

 Covid

Madness

WHY THE FDA WILL APPROVE COVID VACCINES

Dr. Pam Popper

DYI:  Dr. Popper is spot on in her video – [just click on her name] – as today the FDA will damn near approve any new drug if their masters Big Pharma wants it bad enough.  So be prepared for full approval coming soon as States continue to open back up.  Big Pharma will push hard to normalize these so called vaccines into our daily lives right along side all of the others.

Let’s not forget Big Pharma and other industries as well have raided the American taxpayer measured in the Trillions.  World wide this is the biggest theft in history!

DYI

Corruption runs rampant at the W.H.O. so why does anyone trust these scam artists today???

 Blast

From the Past

W.H.O.’s Criminal History

The Swine Flu HOAX!  

Commentary

Why The WHO Faked A Pandemic

Michael Fumento, 02.05.10, 04:35 PM EST

The agency needed to bounce back after the avian flu embarrassment.

The World Health Organization has suddenly gone from crying "The sky is falling!" like a cackling Chicken Little to squealing like a stuck pig. The reason: charges that the agency deliberately fomented swine flu hysteria. "The world is going through a real pandemic. The description of it as a fake is wrong and irresponsible," the agency claims on its Web site. A WHO spokesman declined to specify who or what gave this "description," but the primary accuser is hard to ignore.

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), a human rights watchdog, is publicly investigating the WHO's motives in declaring a pandemic. Indeed, the chairman of its influential health committee, epidemiologist Wolfgang Wodarg, has declared that the "false pandemic" is "one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century."

Click HERE to read the rest of the story!

 DYI

Pfizer Penalty total since 2000: $4,660,896,333: Number of records: 71

 

COVID

MADNESS

Violation Tracker Parent Company Summary

Parent Company Name:  

Pfizer

Ownership Structure:  

publicly traded (ticker symbol PFE)

Headquartered in:  

New York

Major Industry:  

pharmaceuticals

Specific Industry:  

pharmaceuticals

DYI:  Here is a web site dedicated to tracking all settlements greater than $10,000.  There is only one conclusion that can be drawn from this data – [along with the rest of Big Pharma their results are similar] – THEY ARE ORGANIZED CRIME!

Recommended reading for those needing additional and more in depth information. 

Virus Mania 3^rd edition by Dr. Kohniein, MD…Dr. Bailey MD…Dr. Scoglio BSc PhD

Deadly Medicines and Organized Crime by Dr. Peter C. Gotzsche

Our Dailey Meds by Melody Peterson

AIDS INC. by Jon Rappoport

Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History by Dr. Humphries MD and Roman Bystrianyk

DYI

Absolute and Relative the Marketing Game Big Pharma Plays. Does YOUR DOCTOR Know the Difference? Don't Assume!

 COVID

MADNESS

Is the Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine as good as they say?

Posted on January 9, 2021 by alrishi

Disclaimer: Nothing in this document should be construed as medical advice. Please make your health care decisions in consultation with your trusted health care providers. I am simply sharing my personal research in the hope that it will help you in your own decision process. I see it as a guided tour through some of the evidence about the Pfizer vaccine, pro and con. It is not medical advice.

To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate, that is the question many will be facing soon. The media reports on the COVID-19 vaccines have been glowingly positive, showing 95% efficacy with minimal side effects. I know we all need some good news right now, but 95% efficacy seems too good to be true. Being curious and scientific minded (my degree is in Physics), I decided to do a deep dive into the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine summary report filed with the FDA so that I could get a more realistic assessment.

Unsurprisingly, I found that the 95% risk reduction reported is true, but misleading. It is reporting on the relative efficacy, not the absolute efficacy.

 The absolute risk reduction of the Pfizer vaccine is 0.84%, 

hardly inspiring from a marketing perspective.

Absolute risk reduction vs. Relative risk reduction

So what is the difference between relative and absolute risk reduction? I’ll take a simple example and then link to a longer more in depth article for those that want to go deeper.

Suppose there is a new drug that is designed to prevent heart attacks. In the clinical trial, they find 2000 people with a similar risk profile, and assign them randomly into a treatment group and a placebo group of 1000 each. They follow them for two years, and at the end of the two years, there were 100 heart attacks in the placebo group, and 40 heart attacks in the treatment group. In the placebo group, 100 people out of 1000 had heart attacks, which is an absolute risk of 10% (100/1000). In the treatment group, there were 40 heart attacks out of 1000 people, which is an absolute risk of 4%. The absolute risk reduction for the treatment group is the absolute risk of getting a heart attack if untreated (10%) minus the absolute risk of getting a heart attack if treated (4%), which means the absolute risk reduction is 6% (10% – 4%). In other words, over the course of the two years, your heart attack risk if treated will fall from 10% down to 4%.

The relative risk reduction in the above example is the absolute risk reduction divided by the absolute risk, or 6%/10%, which is 60%. You are 60% less likely to have a heart attack if treated than untreated. Here is a graphic to illustrate these terms:

Said another way, your absolute risk of a heart attack is 10% if untreated, and falls to 4% if treated.  If you treat 1000 people at risk of heart attack, only 40 people will have a heart attack vs. the 100 who would have had a heart attack if untreated, which is a 60% relative risk reduction. It is against the absolute risk reduction that most people would prefer to compare the costs of treatment, both financial and in terms of side effects. Side effects are always reported in absolute terms.

The larger the number of people treated, the larger the potential distortion for using relative risk reduction than absolute risk reduction. If there were a million in each group in the example above and the same number of heart attacks, then the relative risk reduction would still be 60%, but the absolute risk reduction would drop to 0.006% – you’d have to treat a million people to get 60 less heart attacks.

Both relative and absolute risk reduction give you important information, but absolute risk reduction is more important for assessing your benefit from the treatment. Since side effects are always listed in absolute terms, it is also easier to compare absolute risk reduction to the risk of side effects. You can see why drugs are usually marketed with relative risk reduction.

Click HERE to read the rest of the article.

DYI

 

IT’S NOT ABOUT A VIRUS IT’S ABOUT CONTROL

A PD File with 7 pages of links showing the progression of fraud and world wide control measures.  For those of you and myself who state, "The devil is in details" this body of work fits the bill.

DYI

The Main Stream Press once again LIES! Only Congress of Federal or State Legislators can Write New Laws as Long as they do not Abridge or Supersede the Constitution.

 Main

Stream

Propaganda

Spewing Press

THE HEALTHY AMERICAN

THE EEOC DOES NOT MAKE LAW

Please, read beneath the headlines

Many of you wonderful HEALTHY AMERICANS sent me news articles today saying...

 "Peggy, look at this! THE EEOC changed the law! Employers can mandate vaccines!"

Well, that might be what the HEADLINES say.

But, when you read the second or third paragraph beneath the headlines (and please,
I implore you to do so...) you'll see the rest of the story.

And the rest of the story clearly states that employers must accommodate employees who do not get the vaccine due to medical or religious exemptions.

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE EEOC

(1) The EEOC did not change the law -- because the EEOC does not make law.

(2) The EEOC is a federal agency called the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

(3) The EEOC upholds federal non-discrimination laws.

(4) The EEOC is on YOUR side as an employee.

(5) The EEOC has sued many companies that discriminate against employees based on their age, disability and/or religion or other protected characteristics.

(6) Most importantly -- the EEOC confirms and reaffirms the fact that employers MUST provide reasonable accommodations for those who do not want to be vaccinated. PERIOD.

I have done many, many, many many videos on this over the past year.

In fact, I created an in-depth class on EMPLOYEE RIGHTS. Click here for info:

https://www.thehealthyamerican.org/employee-rights

Please watch my two latest videos below for the LATEST news on the EEOC, employers and vaccines.

DYI

Stocks Remain Massively Overvalued!

 Margin of Safety!

Central Concept of Investment for the purchase of Common Stocks.

"The danger to investors lies in concentrating their purchases in the upper levels of the market..."

Stocks compared to bonds:

Earnings Yield Coverage Ratio - [EYC Ratio]

Lump Sum any amount greater than yearly salary.

PE10  ..........37.28
Bond Rate...2.72%

EYC Ratio = 1/PE10 x 100 x 1.1 / Bond Rate

1.75 plus: Safe for large lump sums & DCA

1.30 Plus: Safe for DCA

1.29 or less: Mid-Point - Hold stocks and purchase bonds.

1.00 or less: Sell stocks - Purchase Bonds

Current EYC Ratio: 1.08(rounded)

As of  6-1-21
Updated Monthly

PE10 as report by Multpl.com

Bond Rate is the rate as reported by

Vanguard Long-Term Investment-Grade Fund Investor Shares (VWESX)

DCA is Dollar Cost Averaging.

Lump Sum is any dollar amount greater than one year salary.

Over a ten-year period the typical excess of stock earnings power over bond interest may aggregate 4/3 of the price paid. This figure is sufficient to provide a very real margin of safety--which, under favorable conditions, will prevent or minimize a loss......If the purchases are made at the average level of the market over a span of years, the prices paid should carry with them assurance of an adequate margin of safety.  The danger to investors lies in concentrating their purchases in the upper levels of the market.....

Common Sense Investing:
The Papers of Benjamin Graham
Benjamin Graham

%
Stocks & Bonds

Allocation Formula

6-1-21
Updated Monthly

% Allocation = 100 – [100 x (Current PE10 – Avg. PE10 / 4)  /  (Avg.PE10 x 2 – Avg. PE10 / 2)]

Current PE10.....37.28

Avg. PE10...........16.82

% Stock Allocation    0% (rounded)
% Bond Allocation 100% (rounded) 

Logic behind this approach:

--As the stock market becomes more expensive, a conservative investor's stock allocation should go down. The rationale recognizes the reduced expected future returns for stocks, and the increasing risk. 

--The formula acknowledges the increased likelihood of the market falling from current levels based on historical valuation levels and regression to the mean, rather than from volatility. Many agree this is the key to value investing.  

Please note there is controversy regarding the divisor (Avg. PE10).  The average since 1881 as reported by Multpl.com is 16.70.  However, Larry Swedroe and others believe that using a revised Shiller P/E mean of 19.6 , the number since 1960 ( a 53-year period), reflects more modern accounting procedures.

DYI adheres to the long view where over time the legacy (prior 1959) values will be absorbed into the average.  Also it can be said with just as much vigor the last 25 years corporate America has been noted for accounting irregularities.  So....If you use the higher or lower number, or average them, you'll be within the guide posts of value.

Please note:  I changed the formula when the Shiller PE10 is trading at it's mean stocks and bonds will be at 50% - 50% representing Ben Graham's Defensive investor starting point; only deviating from that norm as valuations rise or fall.        

  

DYI

The Formula.

A value based allocation strategy

February 19, 2010 by John Kingham

Updated Monthly

AGGRESSIVE PORTFOLIO - ACTIVE ALLOCATION - 6/1/21

Active Allocation Bands (excluding cash) 0% to 50%

50% - Cash -Short Term Bond Index - VBIRX

50% -Gold- Global Capital Cycles Fund - VGPMX **

 0% -Lt. Bonds- Long Term Bond Index - VBLTX

 0% -Stocks- Total Stock Market Index - VTSAX

[See Disclaimer]

** Vanguard's Global Capital Cycles Fund maintains 25%+ in precious metal equities the remainder are domestic or international companies they believe will perform well during times of world wide stress or economic declines.  

 This blog site is not a registered financial advisor, broker or securities dealer and The Dividend Yield Investor is not responsible for what you do with your money.

This site strives for the highest standards of accuracy; however ERRORS AND OMISSIONS ARE ACCEPTED!

The Dividend Yield Investor is a blog site for entertainment and educational purposes ONLY.

The Dividend Yield Investor shall not be held liable for any loss and/or damages from the information herein.

Use this site at your own risk.

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NO GUARANTEE OF FUTURE RESULTS.