Thursday, June 12, 2025

 Wilshire 5000

Massive Overvaluation!



 

Finland’s National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL) can't cite scientific evidence of "H5N1"... or any virus

it's “not at all possible”

2025

Greetings and Best Wishes,

(Note: if you would like to pitch in to help renew my website or otherwise support my efforts, please see the Paypal button near the bottom of my homepage. Or, if you are on the land known as Canada you could send an email transfer to cmssyc@gmail.com.)


Last year, Andrii Komar filed a freedom of information request with Finland’s National Institute for Health and Welfare (“THL”) (pgs 2-4). He sought all studies held by the institution, from anywhere in the world, that describe someone finding and purifying particles thought to be H5N1, H7N9 or any other new or rare subtype of the alleged influenza A virus, from a patient sample (bodily fluid or tissue).

Below is gmail’s auto-translation of the request to English (pg 6):

Purification, as many now realize, would be a necessary foundational step in attempting to show that a virus with the claimed “genome” and proteins actually exists and causes illness in “hosts”. Purification is required in order for valid sequencing and characterization to take place (for identification purposes), and it is essential in order to conduct a valid, rigorous controlled experiment to test a falsifiable hypothesis regarding causation of illness.

Without this step there cannot be any scientific evidence of a virus.

Below is the (auto-translated) response (pg 7, see original on pg 2) that Andrii received from Tuuli Karppinen, a lawyer at the Department of Health and Welfare. (Click to enlarge the image.)

“…the National Institute for Health and Welfare has extensive access to scientific literature, including a library and various collections of scientific articles… However, such documents are not, in accordance with Section 5, Subsection 3, Paragraph 3 of the Openness Act, in the nature of official documents that would be provided in response to requests for information under the Openness Act…”

After Andrii showed me this response, I decided to write to Tuuli myself (pgs 1 and 8), using the help of an auto-translator. I indicated that I didn’t believe that the “experts” at the institute have any scientific evidence of any alleged virus and challenged Tuuli to prove me wrong by providing or citing some. I told her that her response or lack thereof would be published.

Predictably, even though Tuuli responded (pgs 1 and 9), she did not provide or cite any scientific evidence and there was none to be found at the webpage to which she directed me.

If you are wondering how I know that Tuuli Karppinen is a lawyer, she identified as such in 2022 when responding to a similar request regarding the imaginary SARS-COV-2, as shown in the screenshot further below.

And, similar to the stunning March 1, 2021 admission (pg 3) made by the “subject matter experts” (“SME”) at the CDC and conveyed in an official Freedom Of Information Act response, and the stunning summer of 2020 admission made by “experts” at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto - not just one time but a 2nd time as well - in their official FOI response, Tuuli Karppinen at Finland’s Department of Health and Welfare stated in her 2022 email shown below that finding and “isolating” any virus (in the every day sense of the word, aka purifying it) from its alleged locations (“hosts”) is “not at all possible” and isn’t done in the so-called “science” of virology.

In other words, just like the CDC “subject matter experts” and the Mount Sinai Hospital “experts”, Tuuli indirectly and inadvertently confessed that virology is not a science and that no alleged virus has ever been scientifically shown to exist.

Virologists don’t even have a valid independent variable with which they could scientifically test a hypothesis regarding causation of symptoms in “hosts”, and they cannot even show that particles with the claimed “viral genomes” and “viral” proteins exist in “hosts”. Their entire field is a pseudoscientific sham.

Life in prison for everyone responsible.

(Anyone who is new to this topic and wants to learn more can find lots of material to get started with, here.)

(Note: this information has been sent to ~200 people who work for “the state”, lamestream media, etc. at Canada, Isle of Man, England and the U.S., so that they cannot claim later that they did not know. It will also be sent to people who act in the Canadian “justice” system… that has falsely prosecuted people in relation to “germs”.)

Recommended Germ/Contagion Reading/Viewing

Another Fear Campaign: “Three Measles Deaths in the U.S.” – Truth or Propaganda? - Kate Sugak

Uncovering the Corona Fraud Part 24: July 14th, 2020 to July 22nd, 2020 - Mike Stone, viroLIEgy

A catch up on the pandemic industry & some more fake virology in action - Dr Mark Bailey on The Fair Food Forager & Friends Show #173

Legendary investigative reporter Jon Rappoport recently did a rare interview in which he discussed the virology hoax and wisely proposed a #MedicalTruthNow campaign to expose the fact that medical care is actually a leading cause of death.

Is Desperation Setting In? And is the sun rising on a new paradigm? - Dawn Lester

The Greatest Scam Exposed... (the government scam!)… with Etienne de la Boetie² - Drs Sam and Mark Bailey

Official FOI Confessions/Evidence Confirm that Virology is Pseudoscience

My notarized affidavit regarding the hundreds of freedom of information responses (FOIs) confirming the fraud and delusion of virology, with German and Greek translations:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/affidavit-re-foi-and-fraud-and-delusion-of-virology
Also at tinyurl.com/virus-affidavit

Freedom of Information Responses reveal that health/science institutions around the world (225 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 (the alleged convid virus) isolation/purification, anywhere, ever:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/

Excel file listing 225 institutions:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Institution-list-for-website.xlsx

FOI responses re other imaginary “viruses” (HIV, avian influenza, HPV, influenza, measles, etc., etc., etc.):
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-have-no-record-of-any-virus-having-been-isolated-purified-virology-isnt-a-science/

FOIs re secretive and unscientifically "mock infected" cells (aka invalid controls) and computer-model "viral genomes":
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/do-virologists-perform-valid-control-experiments-is-virology-a-science/

3000+ pages of "virus" FOIs in 8 compilation pdfs:
https://tinyurl.com/IsolationFOIs

Failed freedom of Information responses re contagion:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/freedom-of-information-responses-re-contagion/

Do health and science institutions have studies proving that bacteria CAUSE disease?
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/do-health-authorities-have-studies-proving-that-bacteria-cause-disease-lets-find-out-via-freedom-of-information/

Because "they" (HIV, influenza virus, HPV, measles virus, etc., etc., etc.) have never been shown to exist, clearly don't exist and virology isn't a science.

For truth, freedom and sanity,
Christine


Friday, June 6, 2025

 If you think you’re getting poorer

In America 

It’s because you are!

Chart found HERE.



 

Big Pharma!

Observations 

It is possible, and even probable that some of the current ‘truth movements’ have been set up by the ‘would-be controllers’ for the sole purpose of initiating their ‘divide and conquer’ strategy to destroy the real ‘truth’ about important topics of our times, such as the existence of ‘viruses’. 

As many of us have now demonstrated, there is no evidence that any particle that has been labelled a ‘virus’ has been proven to be the cause of disease. This can be stated as a fact about reality and therefore shown to be ‘true’ - unless and until someone can provide some genuine evidence that demonstrates otherwise. This fact about viruses can be extrapolated to also apply to bacteria and other so-called ‘germs’, which have also never been proven to be ‘disease-causing’ agents.

Taken together, these facts threaten not only the entire vaccine industry, but also a huge proportion of the pharmaceutical industry, as well as a significant proportion of the chemical industry, because there is no longer any need for them to manufacture products that ‘fight germs’.

Obviously, those of us who maintain that there is no evidence for the existence of pathogenic ‘germs’, whether viruses, bacteria, fungi or parasites, are still a relatively small group, although we cannot be referred to as a ‘movement’ as we do not have leaders.

There is a second group of people who correctly claim that vaccines are dangerous, but incorrectly claim that there are nevertheless such things as ‘pathogenic germs’, especially viruses. This somewhat larger group is comprised of and led by many highly qualified doctors and scientists, a factor that serves to make their case seem highly credible to the general public.

Then there is a third group, which comprises mainstream organizations such as the WHO, CDC, NHS and government ‘health’ departments in almost every country. This group states that ‘Covid’ is/was real, masks and social distancing are important measures to protect public health, and that vaccines are safe and effective. This group also continues to promulgate ‘stories’ about various other ‘infectious diseases’ and threats of ‘future pandemics’.

The existence of these 3 groups with seemingly irreconcilable differences serves the ‘agenda’ by ensuring that the general public, or most of them at least, remain confused, which makes them more likely to defer to the mainstream and their narrative because they are more familiar with them as the ‘experts’ with respect to matters of health, although familiarity is not the same as truth. This situation has the potential to destroy any and all opposition in the process.

 




Bird flu hoax alert: US Animal & Plant Health Inspection Service fails official evidence challenge

another FOIA failure, consistent with the pseudoscientific literature

Greetings and Best Wishes,

My July 21, 2024 FOIA order filed with the U.S. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Department of Agriculture finally came to completion in March of this year. It resulted in a grand total of zero responsive records being provided or cited by the “experts” there.

My order was for:

All studies in the possession/custody/control of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Department of Agriculture, authored by anyone, anywhere:

1. - that scientifically prove/provide evidence of the existence of any alleged "avian influenza virus" (showing that the alleged particles exist, invade and replicate in "host" cells and cause the illness/symptoms that they are alleged to cause), or

2. - that (at least) describe the purification of particles that are alleged to be "avian influenza virus" directly from bodily fluid/tissue/excrement of so-called "hosts", with purification confirmed via EM imaging, or

3. - wherein the purported "genome" of any alleged "avian influenza virus" was found intact in the bodily fluid/tissue/excrement of a "host" (as opposed to fabricated in silico, aka a computer model), or

4. - that scientifically demonstrate contagion of the illness / symptoms that are allegedly caused by purported "avian influenza viruses".

As usual, I asked that if any records matched the above description and were currently available elsewhere, I be provided citations so that I could identify and access them. I also stated that “If a timeframe is necessary, please use January 1, 1950 until the date of the search”.

I have previously reported that 1 month later, on August 22, 2024, Yvonne Marquez acting as Government Information Specialist indicated to me that they were working on the order and that “Any responsive documents that have been found will then be forwarded to me for review and possible release”. I published my response to Yvonne, and later updated the report with my January 2025 follow up attempt.

Update:

On March 17, 2025, 8 months after filing the FOIA order, I received a letter labelled #2024-APHIS-06103-F and “digitally signed by WALLACE KURALT for: Tonya G. Woods, Director, Freedom of Information & Privacy Act, Legislative and Public Affairs” (pg 14/15).

According to Tonya (emphasis added):

“…it is our determination that your request lacks sufficient specificity as to the program personnel required for this search, any specific program areas to search for responsive records, or date range for records in order to conduct a search for records responsive to your request.

… in order to attempt to best assist you, please note that VS program subject matter experts have provided two (2) documents, totaling twenty-nine (29) pages of records, appearing to be potentially responsive to your request…

Accordingly, due to the flaws in your original request rendering a reasonable search untenable, we are closing this request with this response and release…”

So, the timeframe that I had provided was ignored and 2 additional excuses were provided for supposedly not performing a search (which other institutions have conducted - see their official failures here).

Despite implying that a search hadn’t been conducted, Tonya, acting as Director, somehow provided 2 documents “appearing to be potentially responsive” 😂.

The first document (pg 16 - 32) is titled “Isolation of Avian Influenza and Avian Paramyxoviruses Viruses in Chicken Embryos from Avian Species”. Notice the oxymoronic reference to “isolation in chicken embryos”… and the emphasis that the alleged avian viruses and chicken embryos were from avian species.

This document is a protocol (describing pseudoscientific methodologies endorsed by the so-called “World Organization for Animal Health”), not a study. Thus, it cannot contain scientific evidence of an alleged virus or contagion.


This “isolation” protocol does not describe steps that could possibly result in scientific evidence of a virus or contagion or even evidence of a purported “genome”.

It does not require any potential viruses (particles) to be found and isolated per the normal definition of the word (aka purified), let alone sequenced and characterized for identification purposes or studied with valid controlled experiments to test for causation of a contagious illness.

(Purified particles would be required, before one could even attempt valid sequencing, characterization and scientific experiments.)

Instead, simply put, this protocol requires unpurified, unidentified material from the bodily fluid or tissue of chickens to be injected, along with antibiotics, through egg shells into embryos and for the eggs to be sealed with cement or quick-drying glue, then for the embryos to be monitored for death, and then for amnio-allantoic fluid to be removed and tested for a never-shown-to-exist virus, using a test that doesn’t test for a virus. Because “science”.

Here are the names of some of the people involved in this madness:


The 2nd document (pg 33 - 44) provided by Tonya G. Woods acting as Director is titled “Intravenous Pathogenicity Assessments for Avian Influenza Virus in Chickens”.

It is another protocol (for more pseudoscientific methodologies encouraged by the “World Organization for Animal Health”) and therefore does not contain scientific evidence of anything.

You can see based on the title that the authors frame intravenous injections of so-called (viral) “isolate” as a valid way of testing whether a presumed virus causes illness in chickens, when it obviously is not. Chickens do not go around administering intravenous injections of a fake “isolate” into each other. This procedure has nothing to do with how imaginary viruses are claimed to spread in nature. It lacks a valid exposure route, as well as a valid independent variable (purified particles, taken from “hosts”).

Here are the names of some of the people involved in this madness:


I finally responded to Tonya’s letter yesterday (pg 45 - 48); a partial screenshot is further below.

Many more official “bird flu” confessions and failures are HERE. And HERE is an important questionnaire for farmers to keep on hand and give to any “government” agents that want to inspect their animals.

Life in prison.

(Note: this information has been sent to ~200 people who work for “the state”, lamestream media, etc. at Canada, Isle of Man, England and the U.S., so that they cannot claim later that they did not know. It will also be sent to people who act in the Canadian “justice” system… that has falsely prosecuted people in relation to “germs”.)

If you would like to support my efforts, please see the Paypal button that is near the bottom of my homepage.


Recommended Germ/Contagion Reading/Viewing

How Lyme Disease was Weaponized - Dr Sam Bailey

WHO and the Pandemic Agreement - Kate Sugak

Another look at the Avian Bird Flu + Are Ostriches the solution to COVID? - Dr. Tom Cowan

The Mirror Cytopathic Effect - Mike Stone, viroLIEgy
Reflections of a Failed Pseudoscientific Hypothesis

RDCK Board, BC, gets warned of bird flu hoax confessions & potential criminal liability if they accept culled carcasses - Christine Massey, May 2025

English translation of a Dutch article by Sanne Burger:
Viruses don’t cause disease, because they don’t exist

Dan Dicks, long-time investigative journalist “in” Canada, is being lauded for his “real journalism” in covering the British Columbia ostrich farm angle of the “avian influenza” virus/contagion/antibodies hoax:
This Is Universal Ostrich Inc. – A Deep Dive With Press For Truth, featuring Dr. Andrew Kaufman and Christine Massey

Has a Virus Ever Actually Been Shown to Exist? - Dr. Tom Cowan with Jeremy Nell aka Jerm Warfare

Flu or cold is not caused by a virus (click icons at top right to translate)


Official FOI Confessions/Evidence Confirm that Virology is Pseudoscience

My notarized affidavit regarding the hundreds of freedom of information responses (FOIs) confirming the fraud and delusion of virology, with German and Greek translations:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/affidavit-re-foi-and-fraud-and-delusion-of-virology
Also at tinyurl.com/virus-affidavit

Freedom of Information Responses reveal that health/science institutions around the world (225 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 (the alleged convid virus) isolation/purification, anywhere, ever:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/

Excel file listing 225 institutions:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Institution-list-for-website.xlsx

FOI responses re other imaginary “viruses” (HIV, avian influenza, HPV, influenza, measles, etc., etc., etc.):
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-have-no-record-of-any-virus-having-been-isolated-purified-virology-isnt-a-science/

FOIs re secretive and unscientifically "mock infected" cells (aka invalid controls) and computer-model "viral genomes":
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/do-virologists-perform-valid-control-experiments-is-virology-a-science/

3000+ pages of "virus" FOIs in 8 compilation pdfs:
https://tinyurl.com/IsolationFOIs

Failed freedom of Information responses re contagion:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/freedom-of-information-responses-re-contagion/

Do health and science institutions have studies proving that bacteria CAUSE disease?
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/do-health-authorities-have-studies-proving-that-bacteria-cause-disease-lets-find-out-via-freedom-of-information/

Because "they" (HIV, influenza virus, HPV, measles virus, etc., etc., etc.) have never been shown to exist, clearly don't exist and virology isn't a science.

For truth, freedom and sanity,
Christine