COVID
Madness
The Forbidden Chronicles
Serious Issues With At-Home Tests
Pamela A. Popper, President
Wellness Forum Health
DYI: I disagree with Dr. Popper regarding the existence of the virus causing Sars-CoV-2. Be as that may be there is so much fraud swirling around the perpetrators – if we had a REAL FBI – would spend 100 years plus in prison! Whether real or fake it doesn’t matter due to all of massive criminal behavior taking place. If you’re in the fake camp – me included – don’t throw the baby out with the bath water when it comes to the rest of her article. She is spot on!
DYI: Abbott Labs and other Big Pharma companies
ranking in billions with their bogus test kits.
The numbers are now so astronomical the average person finds it
impossible to keep track of cumulative dollar amounts. COVID the fraud that just keeps on giving!
There are many reasons to be concerned about this test. A document called "Healthcare Provider Instructions for Use" includes this statement:
"Individuals should report their test result through the NAVICA app (created by Abbott and downloadable for free) and provide all results to their healthcare provider in order to receive appropriate care. All healthcare providers will report all test results they receive from individuals who use the authorized product to relevant public health authorities…"[iv]
"The Reagent Solution contains a harmful chemical…If the solution contacts the skin or eye, flush with copious amounts of water. If irritation persists, seek medical advice."[v]
The chemical is sodium azide, and here are excerpts from a CDC website providing facts about sodium azide:
"Sodium azide is a rapidly acting, potentially deadly chemical that exists as an odorless white solid."
Sodium azide is best known as the chemical found in automobile airbags. An electrical charge triggered by automobile impact causes sodium azide to explode and convert to nitrogen gas inside the airbag.
Sodium azide is used as a chemical preservative in hospitals and laboratories. Accidents have occurred in these settings. In one case, sodium azide was poured into a drain, where it exploded and the toxic gas was inhaled (breathed in)
- Sodium azide is used in agriculture (farming) for pest control.
- Sodium azide is also used in detonators and other explosives
- Following release of sodium azide into the air, you could be exposed by breathing in the dust or the gas that is formed.
- Sodium azide can also enter the body and cause symptoms through skin contact.
- An explosion involving sodium azide may cause burn injury as well as expose people to the toxic gas, hydrozoic acid.
- Sodium azide prevents the cells of the body from using oxygen. When this happens, the cells die.
- Sodium azide is more harmful to the heart and the brain than to other organs, because the heart and the brain use a lot of oxygen."[vi]
If you can figure out how to test yourself without being harmed by the reagent, what can you expect?
Consumers are instructed that if their test is negative, they should wait 24 hours and take another test. Apparently you keep looking for COVID until you find it!
"…a negative test does not rule out COVID-19 and should not be used as the sole basis for treatment or patient management decisions, including infection control decisions… Negative results should be treated as presumptive and confirmed with a molecular assay, if necessary, for patient management."
"Testing for asymptomatic individuals should be performed at least twice over three days, with at least twenty-four hours and no more than 48 hours between tests. You may need to purchase additional tests to perform this serial (repeat) testing." Again, we look and look and look for COVID until we find it!!
DYI: Abbott Labs and other Big Pharma company’s plea for more sales of their bogus test kits. Why do I keep on hearing that song Money, Money, Money!
"The performance of this test has not yet been clinically validated for use in patients without signs and symptoms of respiratory infection or for serial screening applications, and performance may differ in these populations." The problem is that these are specific applications for which the test is being used – asymptomatic people and serial testing.The PCR test was used as the comparator method. I have written extensively about limitations of the PCR test, which include a very high risk of false positives. For example, in 2006, massive PCR testing was performed at the Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center when it was thought that the medical center was experiencing an epidemic of whooping cough. Almost 1000 healthcare workers were furloughed until their test results were returned. Over 140 employees were told that they had whooping cough, and thousands of others who tested positive were given antibiotics and/or a vaccine for whooping cough.Almost eight months later, employees received an email from the hospital administration which stated that the entire episode was due to PCR testing error. Not even one case of whooping cough was confirmed with a more reliable follow-up test, and it was determined that the employees just had a common cold, not whooping cough.[ix]
"The performance of BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Self Test was established with 53 nasal swabs collected from individual symptomatic patients (within 7 days of onset) who were suspected of COVID-19."[xi]
There is more "evidence" for the validity of the test in the document, but none of it justifies approving the use of this test in any situation, let alone for mass distribution.
There are significant risks associated with taking this test:
- If you report your meaningless results, your status might be used by the government to regulate your activity or confine you; or perhaps even to force vaccinate you or make your return to regular life contingent on a booster shot.
- Your meaningless test results may also be used by your local health department to determine the rules and restrictions in your area.
- A negative test is meaningless, and you may be mandated to repeat the test or subject yourself to other tests in a medical setting. The intent seems to be to record as many "cases" as possible.
- A positive test also is meaningless since the test cannot distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV.
[i] Centers for Disease Control Division of Laboratory Systems. 7/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing. https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/
[ii] https://www.cdc.gov/
[iii] https://www.fda.gov/medical-
[iv] https://www.fda.gov/media/
[v] IBID
[vi] Centers for Disease Control. Facts About Sodium Azide. Emergency Preparedness and Response. https://emergency.cdc.gov/
[vii] https://www.fda.gov/media/
[viii] IBID
[ix] Kolata G. "Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t." New York Times Jan 22 2007
[x]https://www.youtube.com/
[xi] https://www.fda.gov/media/
Thank You
Pam
DYI
No comments:
Post a Comment