Just in Case

Big Pharma Attempts

Another Fake Virus

JON RAPPOPORT

NOV 24, 2023

China’s…new mystery outbreak…

Gateway Pundit:

An unexplained pneumonia-like sickness is reportedly swiftly spreading through schools in China, leading to a surge of hospitalizations of children.

Over the past few weeks, numerous schools in China, predominantly in Beijing and Liaoning province, have reported a rapid increase in children presenting with severe symptoms. These symptoms, including high fever and lung inflammation, are eerily similar to those of pneumonia, Daily Mail reported.

However, what sets this illness apart is the lack of common respiratory symptoms like coughing. This unique symptom profile has led health professionals to label this as an “undiagnosed pneumonia.”

Note that this peculiar symptomatology has reportedly baffled health professionals, who are struggling to categorize and understand this new illness.

Mystery? Baffling? Eerie?

I don’t think so. They always give you: “This has no explanation”—just before they magically announce they’ve found a new virus.

Of course, they never actually isolate that new virus. They never discover it. They just invent a fairy tale.

As far as “mysterious” is concerned in China right now, here is a definitive statement from the American Thoracic Society: “It is possible to have pneumonia without a cough or fever.”

For years, doctors have been diagnosing patients with pneumonia when there is no cough present. It’s not baffling. It’s not ultra-strange. So forget about that.

Which leaves the question: what IS making all these children in China sick? Hmm. Let’s see. Could it be changes in the moon’s orbit? Sun spots? Lasers fired from UFOs? Infected bats imported from Mars?

No?

Well, how about THIS?

US Embassy in China, October 30, 2023:

EVENT: This is a notification that the Beijing City Government has issued an ‘orange’ alert for air pollution effective from 12:00 Monday, October 30 until 24:00 Thursday, November 2. An ‘orange’ alert means that official forecasts indicate Beijing’s Air Quality Index (AQI) will exceed 200 for two consecutive days or 150 for three consecutive days. The alert may be extended if air pollution levels persist.

During an “orange” alert, some businesses may reduce operations.

ACTIONS TO TAKE: The U.S. EPA recommends people with heart or lung disease, older adults, children, and teenagers limit or avoid outdoor physical activity when the AQI level exceeds 200. It recommends everyone avoid outdoor exertion if the AQI level exceeds 300.

Reuters, October 31, 2023:

Authorities issued their highest warnings for fog and haze on Tuesday as smog enveloped major cities in northern China, warning the public that visibility could drop to less than 50 meters (164 feet).

Northern Province of Hebei launched an anti-pollution emergency response, listing traffic safety controls for when necessary including suspending flight takeoffs and landings, temporarily closing highways and suspending ferries, China's meteorological bureau said in a notice.

As air pollution levels in the wider Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area and northern part of Henan province reached moderate to severe, pollution control experts said increased industrial activities, heavy trucking and crop fires had contributed to the haze, state media CCTV reported.

Crisis 24, a “global security platform,” reports that heavy pollution is occurring in Northern China provinces, including Beijing and Liaoning, the two areas reporting the “mystery illness” in children.

I see.

Pollution causing lung problems.

Wow. I just fell off my chair. What a revelation. Who ever heard of that?

Yeah. I went through all this—reported on all this—in 2020—with “COVID.” That was a mysterious pneumonia, too. Except for the heavy air pollution. Every year in China, about 300,000 people die from pneumonia (lung problems). That means there are millions of cases.

No matter how much we wish - the COVID vaccine continues it harms and deaths!

 This 

Speaks for Itself!

Maybe Raymond Smith will do an "Anal bleeding" song next?

My ass was bleeding all night long

The doctors are baffled as I sing this song

My time is up I wont last long

Pfizer said they did nothing wrong

My lawyer says there's nothing I can do

Pfizer is immune and I can not sue

I took two jabs and all I got

Is coming out of my ass a huge blood clot

I just did what they told me to

I listened to the news and the WHO

Nothing can save me no last resort

I'm going to end up on The Kurgan Report

 Worldwide Multi-Trillion Dollar

Business of Medicine

The Over diagnosis Industry: 

Consumers Should Just Say "No!"
Pamela A. Popper, President
Wellness Forum Health

One of the most common questions I’m asked by people is "I’m seeing my doctor for a checkup this week – what tests should I ask him/her to perform?"

My answer: Maybe you should rethink the annual checkup. Almost all studies have shown it to be useless.[1] [2] But if you must see a doctor to have prescriptions filled, first look into whether or not your prescriptions are necessary, and also the potential to reverse the conditions for which they are prescribed.

But the direct answer to the question about which tests to ask for: as few as possible, potentially none. And, according to a recent article in Fortune Magazine called "The Growing Case for Doing Less: How harmless cancers are being overdiagnosed in America,"[3] you should be particularly wary of cancer screening tests.

I used to be considered an outlier in this area, and every time I discussed this topic, I could expect a lot of hate mail from people who truly believed that more medical attention leads to better outcomes, and that "early detection saves lives." This has never been true, and more and more health professionals are realizing it and agreeing with me.

One of the first mainstream doctors to speak out – in 2009 – was Laura Esserman, a breast cancer surgeon and oncology specialist in San Francisco. She co-authored an article, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association,[4] which stated that routine screening for breast and prostate cancer was not reducing the incidence of aggressive and late-stage cancers, which was supposed to be the goal of screening tests. She also was the subject of hate mail, but now reports that things have changed. Women from all over the world are consulting with her because she often advises doing nothing in response to a diagnosis of DCIS, or ductal carcinoma in situ.

DCIS is often referred to as zero stage cancer, but diagnosis has typically been followed by aggressive treatment that can include mastectomy, lumpectomy, radiation and often a 5-year course of hormone blockade drugs. This is a lot of treatment, particularly considering that a study of 100,000 women followed for two decades showed that women who were diagnosed and treated for DCIS had about the same risk of dying of breast cancer as women in the general population.[5] This essentially means that for most women, the risks associated with screening and treatment for early or non-existent cancer far outweigh benefits – in fact there aren’t any benefits. Dr. Esserman says, "Getting a biopsy is not pleasant, and 75% of all the biopsies we do turn out to be nothing. You stick a needle in the breast and sometimes you’ll see these little calcifications that are benign–but incidentally, there’s focus on DCIS, and the next thing someone’s getting a bilateral mastectomy. You think those things don’t happen. They happen all the time."[6]

Overdiagnosis is not limited to breast cancer – the same is true for prostate, melanoma, and thyroid cancer. The reason is "improved" technology, which now detects cancers at earlier stages, including stages at which the cancer poses little to no threat to the patient. A recent meta-analysis of 18 randomized clinical trials including over two million people concluded that "current evidence does not substantiate the claim" that screening tests like mammography, colonoscopy, and PSA testing save lives.[7]

The same is true of skin cancer screening. The incidence of melanoma is now 6 times higher than it was 40 years ago, mainly because more doctors are looking for it. But the death rate remains the same. There are no randomized controlled trials showing that melanoma screening reduces the risk of dying from melanoma.[8]

Cancer screening expert Ade Anderson at Dell Medical School urges caution with screening tests, stating that "In our exuberance to find these cancers, we have basically turned a lot of healthy people who are not destined to die from the cancers into patients." He adds that screening 1000 women for breast cancer results in saving one woman from early death, but many of the other 999 will endure false positives, painful biopsies, anxiety, and possibly surgery and overtreatment – all of which can result in harm. In other words, the incessant screenings are finding disease that we may all be better off not knowing about.[9]

The main reason that cancer screening remains a booming business is not because it "saves lives," but rather due to economics. It is estimated that the screening business generates $80 billion dollars in sales annually in the U.S,[10] and screening is the best way to recruit patients for the cancer treatment industry which generates hundreds of billions of dollars for medical centers annually.

A credible voice of reason is Rita Redberg, former editor of the Journal of the American Medical Association: "I don’t think people feel better from all these screening tests we do, and they lead to a lot of complications. I think we would make a lot more impact if we worked on public health campaigns to stop smoking, stop vaping, increase physical activity, and improve our diets. That would really reduce cancer–and people would feel better."[11]

Amen to that!

 

---

[1] Bloomfield HE, Wilt TJ. "Evidence Brief: Role of the Annual comprehensive Physical Examination in the Asymptomatic Adult."

VA Evidence-based Synthesis Program Evidence Briefs.
[2] Krogsboll L, Jorgensen K, Larsen C, Gotzsche P. "General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease:
Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis." BMJ 2012;345: e7191

[3] Carolyn Barber. The growing case for doing less: How harmless cancers are being overdiagnosed in America. Fortune Magazine Oct 2 2023

[4] Esserman L, Shieh Y, Thompson I. "Rethinking Screening for Breast Cancer." JAMA 2009;302(15):1685-1692

[5] Narod SA, Iqbal J, Giannakeas V et al. "Breast Cancer Mortality After a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ." JAMA Oncol 2015 Oct:1(7):888-896

[6] Carolyn Barber. The growing case for doing less: How harmless cancers are being overdiagnosed in America. Fortune Magazine Oct 2 2023

[7] Bretthauer M, Wieszczt P, Loberg M et al. "Estimated Lifetime Gained With Cancer Screening." JAMA Intern Med 2023 Aug;183(11):1196-1203

[8] Welch HG, Mazer BL, Adamson AS. "The Rapid Rise in Cutaneous Melanoma Diagnoses." NEJM 2021 Jan;384(1):72-79

[9] Carolyn Barber. The growing case for doing less: How harmless cancers are being overdiagnosed in America. Fortune Magazine Oct 2 2023

[10] https://csph.brighamandwomens.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Estimating-Annual-Expenditures-for-Cancer-Screening-in-the-United-States.pdf

[11] Carolyn Barber. The growing case for doing less: How harmless cancers are being overdiagnosed in America. Fortune Magazine Oct 2 2023

In my opinion the CDC is incapable of being reformed it need to be closed as of yesterday!

CDC can't find any studies demonstrating contagion of colds/flu/fake-covid... maybe because they don't exist

Latest in long string of CDC "germ" FOI failures

CHRISTINE MASSEY FOIS NOV 26 April 10, 2023: A FOIA request was sent to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry for all studies/reports scientifically demonstrating contagion of any respiratory disease. April 13, 2023: CDC acknowledged the request and placed it in their “complex processing queue” April 18, 2023: CDC put the request on hold pending my provision of further details; details were affirmed that same day. April 20, 2023: CDC asked for the search to be narrowed; the search was narrowed to respiratory illnesses said to be caused by “coronaviruses” or “influenza viruses” with the timeframe beginning in 1900 July 14, 2023: Follow up to CDC asking how the search is going; no response July 19, 2023: Follow up to CDC asking how the search is going; no response July 27, 2023: Follow up to CDC asking how the search is going; no response August 15, 2023: Follow up to CDC asking how the search is going August 16, 2023: CDC’s “Government Information Specialist” says “we’re working on it” (paraphrased) October 14, 2023 (6 months after filing the request): Follow up to CDC asking them to send whatever has been located thus far; I told them that if I don't receive records by 5pm, Oct. 17, I'll be publishing an article about their delayed response November 25, 2023: 7.5 months since the request was filed. Crickets. No update, no records, no evidence of contagion.