Tyranny!

New ‘Red Flag’ Law Could Take Guns Away From Those Who Present a Danger

ABERDEEN, Md. (WJZ) — A new “red flag” law could take guns out of the hands of those who present a danger in a state recently plagued by mass shootings.Maryland’s already tight gun laws are about to lock down further.

Starting October 1, families and police can ask the courts to take guns away from people flagged as dangerous.It aims to prevent attacks like the one at the Rite Aid distribution center last Thursday. 
The law goes on the books a week and a half after the mass attack in Harford County.

DYI:  Completely based on a false premise as the Rite Aid was another DHS FEMA drill; no one was shot; no one was killed or wounded promoted as real by the lying PROPAGANDA spewing main stream press.  Even if the premise was real [it is not] this is unconstitutional as the courts/police are taking away an individual’s rights who have NOT committed a crime!

Gun owners must oppose ‘red flag’ laws that deny people rights without due process

A new wave of dangerous laws is being pushed across the United States. These laws don’t require due process and your rights are removed without a crime ever being committed. If this sounds familiar, then it may sound like something out of “Minority Report” with Tom Cruise. Sadly, it isn’t a Hollywood blockbuster, it’s the new America. At least it will be if yours don’t fight back. 

“Red flag” laws, also known as “extreme risk protection orders” or “gun violence restraining orders,” have now passed in 12 states. Even some Republican-controlled states (Indiana and Florida) have passed these laws. They are dangerous to freedom, unconstitutional and should be more properly termed “gun confiscation orders.” 

So how exactly do these “red flag” laws work? There isn’t one answer for this as states implement them differently. Generally speaking, the police are notified by someone (usually an immediate family member) that a person is a threat to themselves or others. The police gather evidence from the family member and take it to a judge. The judge then determines if there is sufficient evidence of a threat. If he believes there is, he then issues an order for the police to confiscate the individual’s guns.

Remember, no crime has been committed, and the person who loses their rights does not get to defend themselves before those rights are removed. 

 Some have the audacity to call this “due process.” It’s not due process if you aren’t part of the process.  

Going to court after your guns have been removed, to petition to get them back, is also not due process.

 DYI